Crime & Justice 2 min read 4h ago

ICE's $20m Electric Shock Gloves Draw Torture Comparisons

The US Department of Homeland Security plans to spend up to $20m on electric shock gloves for ICE agents via a no-bid contract with manufacturer Compliant Technologies.
The devices, branded as 'Generated Low Output Voltage Emitter' gloves, are classified as conductive distraction and de-escalation tools intended for use on uncooperative detainees.
The procurement has drawn comparisons to historical torture instruments from critics, including editorial cartoonist Ann Telnaes, while DHS has not publicly responded to those

The US Department of Homeland Security is set to spend up to $20 million equipping Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents with gloves capable of delivering painful electric shocks to individuals deemed uncooperative during detention or arrest, according to a report published on 11 August by the Associated Press.

No-bid contract for 'de-escalation' devices

The devices, formally designated as "conductive distraction and de-escalation devices" and marketed under the brand name Glove — an acronym for Generated Low Output Voltage Emitter — are to be supplied by their manufacturer, Compliant Technologies, through a no-bid contract with the department.

Torture comparisons emerge

The procurement has provoked pointed criticism. Editorial cartoonist Ann Telnaes responded by publishing an illustration depicting an ICE agent wearing the shock glove alongside a branding iron, an iron maiden, a rack, and other historical instruments of coercion — a visual argument that critics argue places the device within a lineage of torture equipment. Commentators have characterised the broader pattern of DHS detention practices as sadistic, though the department has not publicly responded to those characterisations in the source material available.

Ad Unit · 728×90 / Responsive

Questions of proportionality and oversight

The use of a no-bid contract for a procurement of this scale, combined with the nature of the devices themselves, raises unresolved questions about the oversight mechanisms governing their deployment and the criteria by which ICE agents would determine a detainee to be "uncooperative." Neither Compliant Technologies nor DHS has been reported as having issued a public statement addressing those concerns. The extent to which the gloves have been or will be deployed in the field remains unclear.

##ICE ##ImmigrationEnforcement ##HumanRights

Ad Unit · 300×250 / Responsive